Cases 121 - 130 of 131
Morrocco v. Johns et al
as 5:2009hc02064
Petitioner:
Frank Morrocco
Respondent:
Tracy Johns, T.R. Craig, James Pugh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Troy Cartwright v. D. Meade
as 09-6760
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY D. CARTWRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
D. MEADE, Correctional Officer, OFFICER MCQUEEN, Intelligence Officer, MR. ANDERSON, Lieutenant and others
Troy Cartwright v. D. Meade
as 08-7717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY D. CARTWRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
D. MEADE, Correctional Officer, OFFICER MCQUEEN, Intelligence Officer, MR. ANDERSON, Lieutenant and others
Cartwright v. American Standard, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv09396
Defendant:
American Standard, Inc., The Budd Company, Garlock, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John M. Cartwright
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Procise v. Ulep et al
as 2:2008cv00328
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Procise
Defendant:
Benjamin T. Ulep, Officer Hogan, E. Byum and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cartwright v. Unnamed Respondent
as 5:2008hc02092
Petitioner:
Robert Alphones Cartwright
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Childress v. Pettiford et al
as 4:2008cv01579
Plaintiff:
Eric Childress
Defendant:
M Pettiford, Assistant Warden LNU, Assistant Warden LNU and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cartwright v. Meade et al
as 7:2008cv00250
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Cartwright
Defendant:
D. Meade, McQueen, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Childress v. Pettiford et al
as 4:2008cv01001
Plaintiff:
Eric Childress
Defendant:
M Pettiford, Assistant Warden LNU, Assistant Warden LNU and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harley v. Heaton et al
as 3:2007cv03420
Plaintiff:
Thomas Harley
Defendant:
Roger Heaton, Sheriff Cartwright, Reddick Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
