Cases 11 - 20 of 1,226
Adrian Johnson v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv01494
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KIVETT v. USA
as 1:2024cv00265
Petitioner:
STEVEN ADRIAN KIVETT
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bynum v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02049
Petitioner:
Adrian Bynum
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Bennett et al
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Kiara Freeman
Defendant:
Adrian B. Bennett, Arka Express, Inc. and BJT Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Porter v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00108
Petitioner:
Adrian Porter
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flores v. Daniels et al
as 7:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Adrian Flores
Defendant:
J.A. Daniels and Richlands Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00609
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
George Mitchell, Robert Hendren, Ralph Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Coles v. Dalton et al
as 7:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Coles
Defendant:
G. Dalton, K. Lewis, Carl Manis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Adrian Isaiah Gray
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KIVETT v. USA
as 1:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
STEVEN ADRIAN KIVETT
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
