Cases 11 - 20 of 115
US v. Melchor Calderon
as 22-4357
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MELCHOR CALDERON
Aluira et al v. W.G./Welch Mechanical Contractors, LLC
as 1:2022cv01510
Plaintiff:
Jose L Aluira, Ricardo Calderon, Manuel Carllo and others
Defendant:
W.G./Welch Mechanical Contractors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Immigration: Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Calderon-Velasquez v. Mears et al
as 1:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
Alex Calderon-Velasquez
Defendant:
D. Mears and Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
St. Clair v. Office of Child Support et al
as 8:2022cv01464
Plaintiff:
Gregory St. Clair
Defendant:
Office of Child Support, Director Jo-Ella Brooks, Christopher Kunz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
US v. Reynaldo Calderon
as 22-6345
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
REYNALDO CALDERON, a/k/a Ray
Aluira et al v. W.G./Welch Mechanical Contractors, LLC
as 1:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
Jose L Aluira, Ricardo Calderon, Manuel Carllo and others
Defendant:
W.G./Welch Mechanical Contractors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Calderon v. USA
as 2:2022cv00059
Petitioner:
Nina Renee Calderon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ina Calderon-Aguilar v. Merrick Garland
as 21-2187
Petitioner:
INA VIANEY CALDERON-AGUILAR, C.D.Q.C. and C.A.Q.C.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Menjivar et al v. Executive Office for Immigration Review
as 1:2021cv02355
Plaintiff:
Lennis Landaverde Menjivar, Fernando Turcios Escobar, Ada Rodas Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
