Cases 11 - 20 of 26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. JOHNSON
as 1:2016mc00019
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Defendant:
BRIDGETTE D. JOHNSON
Collier et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 2:2014cv00056
Plaintiff:
Betty Collier , Andrew High , Alice High and others
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jenkins v. Atkinson et al
as 5:2014ct03227
Plaintiff:
Ardell L. Jenkins
Defendant:
Kenny Atkinson, Federal Medical Center, Lt. Myrick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. FEDERAL MEDIAL CENTER et al
as 1:2014cv00707
Plaintiff:
ARDELL L. JENKINS
Defendant:
FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER, WARDEN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOHNSON
as 1:2013mc00048
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER D. JOHNSON
Coasey et al v. Tatum et al
as 5:2013cv00523
Plaintiff:
Douglas Coasey , David Mathis and Sawand Reynolds
Defendant:
Mable Tatum, Stephen D Johnson, Brandon Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ALI v. BARNES et al
as 1:2013cv00573
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH SHAKUR ALI
Defendant:
B. J. BARNES and D. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 5:2013cv00420
Plaintiff:
Antoine D. Johnson
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Johnson v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 3:2013cv00155
Plaintiff:
Dora D. Johnson
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Johnson et al v. City of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2012cv00456
Plaintiff:
Darwin Johnson , Latonja D. Johnson and Brenda J. Mathis
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville , Fayetteville City Police Department , Shane Koehler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
