Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1853
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00042
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Heinsohn v. Kendall III
as 8:2023cv01837
Plaintiff:
Frank Heinsohn
Defendant:
FRANK KENDALL, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
Von Gronefeld v. Kendall
as 8:2023cv01407
Plaintiff:
Peter T. von Gronefeld
Defendant:
FRANK KENDALL, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Israel Alvarado v. Lloyd Austin, III
as 23-1419
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISRAEL ALVARADO, STEVEN BARFIELD, WALTER BROBST and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, U.S. Department of Defense, FRANK KENDALL, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Air Force, Department of the Air Force, CARLOS DEL TORO, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy, Department of the Navy and others
Olson v. Austin, et al
as 8:2023cv00800
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Olson
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III and Frank Kendall, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6149
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Doster v. Kendall
as 8:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Hunter Doster
Defendant:
Frank Kendall
Petitioner:
Dr. Peter Marks
Robinson v. Austin et al
as 8:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Bobby L. Robinson, II
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III and Frank Kendall, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
