Cases 11 - 20 of 407
Timothy Reeves v. Circuit Court for Prince George's County
as 24-1104
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY REEVES
Defendant:
CIRCUIT COURT OF PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY, CIRCUIT COURT LAND RECORDS, ROBIN GILL BRIGHT, Lawyer and others
Fox et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Robert Fox, Thomas Elsberry, William English and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
US v. Raymond Gill
as 24-6088
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RAYMOND EDWARD GILL
Lewis et al v. Johnson Hall et al
as 8:2023cv03419
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon, Hon Lisa A. Johnson Hall, Hon, Dolores Dorsainvil and others
Plaintiff:
Terence Lewis and Regina Lewis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345 Injunction against Fraud
Gill v. USA - 2255
as 1:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Gill
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gill v. USA 2255
as 1:2024cv00101
Petitioner:
Raymond Gill
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gill v. USA - 2255
as 1:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Gill
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gill v. USA - 2255
as 1:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Gill
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gill v. USA 2255
as 1:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Gill
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cousins v. Young et al
as 7:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
Eugene Ross Cousins
Defendant:
Col. Eric Young, Sgt. Caplinger, Officer O. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
