Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Groover v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv11850
Plaintiff:
Brenda G. Groover
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Groover et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00173
Plaintiff:
Krista Groover and Earl Groover
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restuarants, LLC et al v. Blitch Enterprises, Inc.
as 5:2010cv00556
Plaintiff:
Dunkin' Donuts Franchised Restuarants, LLC , DD IP Holder LLC and DB Real Estate Assets I, LLC
Defendant:
Blitch Enterprises, Incorporated, Joyce Blitch and Groover B. Blitch
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Bank et al v. United States of America, et al
as 8:2009cv03421
Plaintiff:
Janet Bank and Walter Bank
Defendant:
United States of America, Suburban Hospital Inc. and Doctors Groover, Christie and Merritt, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Groover v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv00507
Plaintiff:
Paula Groover
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bank et al v. United States of America et al
as 8:2009cv02341
Plaintiff:
Janet Bank and Walter Bank
Defendant:
United States of America, Suburban Hospital, Inc. and Doctors Groover, Christie and Merritt, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Groover et al v. Actavis Totowa, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00299
Plaintiff:
Bobbie C. Groover and Walter James Groover
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa, LLC, Actavis, Inc., Mylan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Groover v. Johnson et al
as 7:2008cv01811
Plaintiff:
Ginger Groover and Ginger Groover
Defendant:
Robert L Johnson, L&J Logistics Inc and MOL America Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Herman v. Groover
as 1:2007cv01992
Plaintiff:
Gerald Herman
Defendant:
Harold E. Groover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
