Cases 11 - 20 of 443
Uygur et al v. South Carolina et al
as 3:2023cv06879
Plaintiff:
Cenk Uygur and John Ward
Defendant:
South Carolina, Henry McMaster, Alan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jett v. Powell
as 7:2023cv01674
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Jett, Jr., Tara S. Jett, I.R.J. and others
Defendant:
The Country Acres Association of Columbus County Ltd., George Parker Coleman, Michael P. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
US v. Lori Hammond
as 23-4682
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LORI HAMMOND, a/k/a Lori McCracken, a/k/a Lori Blakely
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Hammond Water Works Department v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv04975
Defendant:
AGC Inc, Raytheon Technologies Corporation, Chemguard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Hammond Water Works Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hammond v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv04762
Plaintiff:
Claude Hammond
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Harrison v. Hammond
as 0:2023cv04681
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Harrison
Defendant:
Jeff L. Hammond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David v. Hood et al
as 3:2023cv04579
Plaintiff:
Lewis Albertus David
Defendant:
Honorable Robert E. Hood, Honorable Bentley Price, Honorable Walton J. McLeod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02195
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
