Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Barrett et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2021cv03882
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., Buckeye Fire Equipment Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Barrett, Ashley Boulafentis, Zack Burtt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barrett et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2021cv00175
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., Buckeye Fire Equipment Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Barrett, Ashley Boulafentis, Zack Burtt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hite v. Gujral et al
as 1:2020cv01165
Defendant:
Gujral, Milana and Sussex II State Prison
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hite v. Reherman
as 1:2020cv00648
Petitioner:
Ronda Hite
Respondent:
M. E. Reherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hite v. Gujral et al
as 1:2020cv00628
Defendant:
Dr. Gujral and Dr. Miliena
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheatley v. International Paper Company et al
as 3:2019cv00704
Plaintiff:
Logan Wheatley
Defendant:
Rite-Hite Company LLC, International Paper Company, Rite-Hite Products Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Richardson v. Hite Pearce et al
as 5:2019cv00035
Defendant:
Climate Ride, Inc., Climate Ride, LLC and Joseph William Hite Pearce
Plaintiff:
Susan Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richardson v. Hite Pearce et al
as 5:2019cv00034
Plaintiff:
Allin Richardson
Defendant:
Climate Ride, Inc., Climate Ride, LLC and Joseph William Hite Pearce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lawson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00206
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Sgt. Hite, Lt. Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Terrece Dion Lawson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Clarke et al
as 1:2019cv00207
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Sgt. Hite, Lt. Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Terrece Dion Lawson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
