Cases 11 - 20 of 35
William Thornton Blakey v. Mark Herring
as 17-7481
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM THORNTON BLAKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK HERRING, Attorney General, SUSAN FOSTER BARR, Assistant Attorney General, RICHARD E. MOORE, Judge and others
Blakey v. Herring et al
as 3:2017cv00468
Plaintiff:
William Thornton Blakey
Defendant:
Mark Herring, Susan Barr, Richard E. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Humes v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv10106
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Humes
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ameduri v. Reichental et al
as 0:2016cv02995
Defendant:
Reichental, Abraham N. Reichental, Damon J. Gregoire and others
Plaintiff:
Ameduri and Phillip Ameduri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Howes v. Reichental et al
as 0:2016cv02810
Plaintiff:
Dave Howes
Defendant:
Abraham N. Reichental, Damon J. Gregoire, Charles W. Hull and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Humes v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06038
Plaintiff:
Terri Humes
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foster v. Reichental et al
as 0:2016cv01016
Plaintiff:
Mark Foster
Defendant:
Abraham Reichental, Damon Gregoire, Charles Hull and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nally v. Reichental et al
as 0:2015cv03756
Plaintiff:
James Nally
Defendant:
Abraham N. Reichental, Charles W. Hull, Daniel S. Van Riper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berg et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02716
Plaintiff:
Joshua Berg , Elizabeth Davis-Berg , Judy Happe Humes and others
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc. and Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hume v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv08532
Plaintiff:
Ann Mahrt Hume
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
