Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Thomas et al v. Cypress Insurance Company et al
as 0:2017cv00802
Plaintiff:
William Mac Thomas and Mac Thomas Trucking
Defendant:
Cypress Insurance Company , James C. Green Company and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00305
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Green v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv03629
Plaintiff:
James David Green
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Green v. Waldron
as 1:2014cv02409
Plaintiff:
James Magoletta Green
Defendant:
Stephen Waldron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Shipman v. Baltimore Police Department
as 14-1471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS SHIPMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARK GRIMES, Chief Legal Counsel, JAMES H. GREEN, Chief Legal Counsel and others
James Green v. Correctional Medical Service
as 14-6561
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MAGOLETTA GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Green v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00691
Plaintiff:
James Magoletta Green
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shipman v. Baltimore Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv00396
Plaintiff:
Dennis Shipman
Defendant:
Baltimore Police Department, Mark A. Grimes, James H. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Green v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 1:2012cv03272
Plaintiff:
James Magoletta Green
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services and Md. Correctional Institution-Hagerstown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv07057
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Green and James Michael Green
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
