Cases 11 - 20 of 213
Richard Kendrick v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7099
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD WADE KENDRICK
Respondent / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
US v. Kendrick Diggs
as 23-4654
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KENDRICK LAMAR DIGGS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC, Rose Lane and Franny's Operations, Inc.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Lowe v. R.S. Dunbar
as 2:2023cv01511
Petitioner:
Kendrick Lowe
Respondent:
Warden R.S. Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kendrick v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Monna Kendrick
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Mcalister v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2022cv04129
Plaintiff:
Tyron Kendrick Mcalister
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
US v. Kendrick Bolds
as 22-4653
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KENDRICK BOLDS, a/k/a K Rock
Kendrick v. USA
as 3:2022cv00522
Petitioner:
Robert William Kendrick
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Richard Kendrick v. L. Edmonds
as 22-7126
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD WADE KENDRICK
Respondent / Appellee:
L. EDMONDS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
