Cases 11 - 20 of 72
Robert A Leak et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01472
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert A Leak, Robert Glenn Hodgson, Steve Knowles, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Levi Springer v. Warden David E. Anderson
as 22-7473
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN DAVID ANDERSON, ASSISTANT WARDEN JOSEPH D. BATEMAN, CHIEF OF SECURITY HOWARD SHARPE and others
Cooper v. Barr et al
as 7:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Israel Ray Cooper
Defendant:
C/O Barr, Sgt. Evans, Lt. Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Springer v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Warden David E. Anderson, Assistant Warden Joseph D. Bateman, Chief of Security Howard Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Landry v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv01520
Defendant:
3M Company, The, DuPont de Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Willard Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1377
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
US v. James Landry
as 21-7657
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES LEONARD LANDRY
US v. James Landry
as 21-7584
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES LEONARD LANDRY
Thompson Construction Group Inc v. LanTech IT LLC et al
as 3:2021cv02949
Plaintiff:
Thompson Construction Group Inc
Defendant:
LanTech IT LLC and William Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
