Cases 11 - 20 of 90
Love v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01190
Plaintiff:
Frank Love
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Reid et al v. Mr. Tokyo Monroe, LLC
as 3:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Chinreye Reid and Shenika Love
Defendant:
Mr. Tokyo Monroe, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Aycock v. Love, Jr. et al
as 5:2022cv00527
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wayne Aycock
Defendant:
Jimmy L. Love, Jr., Leon A. Lucas and J. Franklin Wood, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maye v. Pee Wee et al
as 5:2022ct03439
Plaintiff:
Eddie R. Maye
Defendant:
Pee Wee, Dutch and V-Love Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton et al v. Fussell
as 7:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Hugh Horton, Danny Fryar, Michael Fryar and others
Defendant:
Timothy Fussell
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SPEARMAN v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv00561
Plaintiff:
REVEREND DR. T. ANTHONY SPEARMAN
Defendant:
DERRICK JOHNSON, LEON W. RUSSELL, GLORIA J. SWEET-LOVE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Israel v. County of Cumberland et al
as 5:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Roberta Love Owens Israel
Defendant:
County of Cumberland, Fayetteville Metropolitan Housing Authority Board and Darcel J Brown Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
