Cases 11 - 20 of 1,437
Nathan Carroll v. Northampton Restaurants, Inc.
as 24-1354
Plaintiff:
NATHAN E. CARROLL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, GERALDINE P. CORRIGAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, CRYSTAL A. BATEMAN and others
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON RESTAURANTS, INC., d/b/a Aberdeen Barn Steakhouse
Elias Mejia Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1329
Petitioner:
ELIAS ISMAEL MEJIA RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Hubbard v. The State of New Jersey et al
as 5:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Darrell Hubbard
Defendant:
The State of New Jersey, Union County Prosecutor's Office, Elizabeth Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nowlin et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
as 5:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Carmin Nowlin, Tamika Haley and Jesus Rodriguez
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Israel Veliz-Saenz v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1280
Petitioner:
ISRAEL VALENTIN VELIZ-SAENZ, ANA RUBI LOPEZ-RODRIGUEZ, DALIA MARGARITA VELIZ-LOPEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Jose Soloman-Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1236
Petitioner:
JOSE SOLOMAN-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney general
Cochran et al v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
as 1:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Andrew Cochran, Charlene Cochran, Brent Cochran and others
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
