Cases 11 - 20 of 32
ROGERS TOWNSEND & THOMAS, PC V. HARDEE, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00240
Defendant:
BEATRICE D. HARDEE and MELTON J. HARDEE
Plaintiff:
ROGERS TOWNSEND & THOMAS, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sutton v. McCrory et al
as 5:2015cv00069
Plaintiff:
Kelly Sutton
Defendant:
Pat McCrory, John W. Smith, Phil Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allen et al v. Brock and Scott, PLLC et al
as 3:2015cv00038
Plaintiff:
Toye W. Allen and Arnold Tyler
Defendant:
Brock and Scott, PLLC, Trustee Services of Carolina, LLC, U.S. Bank National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Robert Sayman v. Lehman Brothers Bank, F.S.B.
as 14-1575
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT W. SAYMAN and MARY B. SAYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK, F.S.B., VOLKSWAGEN BANK USA, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC and others
Bailey v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv01849
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Bailey
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, OneWest Bank, Wells Fargo Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Randolph v. Metlife Bank NA et al
as 3:2013cv00111
Plaintiff:
Ann E Randolph
Defendant:
Metlife Bank NA and Rogers Townsend & Thomas PC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
NOLAN v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv00027
Plaintiff:
DONNA K. NOLAN
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and ROGERS, TOWNSEND & THOMAS, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
