Cases 11 - 20 of 2,408
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kenneth Newkirk v. Warden Artrip
as 24-6559
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
WARDEN ARTRIP, INVESTIGATOR HARRIS, ASSISTANT WARDEN BLEVINS and others
Hairston v. Secretary SSA
as 1:2024cv01682
Plaintiff:
Arthur Hairston
Defendant:
Secretary SSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
el Sawahli et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv00994
Plaintiff:
Ali Abdul Rahman el Sawahli, Tatyana Mouhamedovna Dakroub, Nour Ali el Sawahli and others
Defendant:
Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director of USCIS UR M. Jaddou, Associate Director Ted H. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Timothy Payne v. U.S. Army Material Command (AMC)
as 24-1521
Plaintiff:
SSGT. TIMOTHY ADAM PAYNE
Defendant:
U.S. ARMY MATERIAL COMMAND (AMC), f/k/a Installation Management Command (IMCOM), ANGELICA J. JENNETTE, AMC/IMCOM (RSO), JOYCE BALDWIN, AMC/IMCOM (retired services) and others
Darlene Bennett v. Gina Raimondo
as 24-1520
Plaintiff:
DARLENE BENNETT
Defendant:
GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary of Commerce
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00966
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
