Cases 11 - 20 of 702
PORTO CARRERO v. OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
as 1:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
WALBERTO SANCHEZ PORTO CARRERO
Defendant:
OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanchez v. Garland et al
as 4:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Bianca M Sanchez
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Sanchez v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Randy Sanchez, Jr.
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison and Agency of United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guzman Ovalle et al v. A.B.C. Trade, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00864
Defendant:
A.B.C. Trade, LLC also known as ABC Trade, LLC doing business as Hot Pot Kitchen, ABC Trade, LLC and Baolan Liang
Plaintiff:
Edin Guzman Ovalle and Jose Ernesto Sanchez Guevara
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sanchez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
Santiago Sanchez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Medina-Sanchez et al v. Apple Vir LLC
as 6:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Stacey Medina-Sanchez and Tamika Lyle
Defendant:
Apple Vir LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
US v. Salvador Sanchez-Hernandez
as 24-4151
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SALVADOR SANCHEZ-HERNANDEZ
US v. Carlos Sanchez-Villa
as 24-4129
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CARLOS SANCHEZ-VILLA
Taylor v. Warden, F.C.I. Edgefield
as 2:2024cv00177
Petitioner:
Marquiz Sanchez Taylor
Respondent:
Warden, F.C.I. Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
