Cases 11 - 20 of 91
THOMAS-BEY v. STINE
as 1:2023cv00035
Petitioner:
ALPHONZA L.P. THOMAS-BEY
Respondent:
JOSH STINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Stine et al
as 7:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ternae Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Ofc. Christopher Stine, Ofc. Aaron Hankins, Ofc. M. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferrell v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv01683
Plaintiff:
JaQuan Ferrell
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bryan P. Stirling, Joel Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Cox v. Stirling et al
as 4:2021cv03797
Plaintiff:
Chavis Cox and Chavis Laranzo Cox
Defendant:
Bryan Stirling, Joel Anderson, Dennis Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banner v. Anderson et al
as 6:2021cv03738
Plaintiff:
Genuine Truth Banner
Defendant:
Joel Anderson, Joseph Stines, Dennis Patterson, Sr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merritt v. Pittman et al
as 5:2021ct03248
Plaintiff:
Robert Merritt
Defendant:
Sgt. Pittman, Lt. Tomson, C/O Walt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick v. Maygen et al
as 5:2021ct03240
Plaintiff:
Terry Antoine Frederick
Defendant:
Nurse Nickey Maygen, Lt. Tomson, Lt. Stine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwin v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01537
Defendant:
Emily Anderson, Michael McCall, Sam Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Hakeem Edwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smith v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01538
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Michael McCall, Emily Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hattar v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01120
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Marquita McCullough, Uniqueqa James and others
Plaintiff:
Solieman Hattar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
