Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Whirlpool Properties, Inc. et al v. Filters Fast, LLC
as 3:2017cv00601
Plaintiff:
Whirlpool Properties, Inc. , Whirlpool Corporation and Maytag Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Filters Fast, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Grogan v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 1:2017cv00835
Plaintiff:
Michael Grogan
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Waters v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00790
Plaintiff:
Gayle Waters
Defendant:
Jimmy Hammond of Pocomoke, Inc. and Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
John J Grady Partnership v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 8:2016cv03499
Plaintiff:
John J Grady Partnership
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Waugh v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00661
Plaintiff:
Jack Junior Waugh
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Autozone, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mitchell v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv06830
Plaintiff:
Joshua A. Mitchell
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation and John Doe Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Standard Fire Insurance Company v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 8:2015cv00222
Plaintiff:
The Standard Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation and Bray and Scarff, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAYNE et al v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
as 1:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
JANE WALKER PAYNE and CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, THE
Defendant:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brinkley v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 5:2013cv00041
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Plaintiff:
Gayle A. Brinkley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Brinkley v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 3:2013cv00162
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Plaintiff:
Gayle A Brinkley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
