Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 72
Vivia Artz et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03893
Plaintiff: Vivia Artz , Marilyn Alexander , Cathy Anderson and others
Defendant: Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Larsen v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv07683
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Lois Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larsen-Davis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03501
Plaintiff: Monica Larsen-Davis and James Davis
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams-Larsen et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02016
Plaintiff: Judith Adams-Larsen and Donald Larsen
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larsen et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01847
Plaintiff: Annette Larsen and Brett Larsen
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larsen v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01209
Plaintiff: Kris Larsen
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2056
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Anthony Nobles v. Roderick Boyd
as 15-1685
Plaintiff - Appellee: ANTHONY NOBLES
Defendant - Appellant: RODERICK BOYD, KEITH LARSEN and SOUTHERN INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING FOUNDATION, a North Carolina Corporation
Anthony Nobles v. Roderick Boyd
as 15-1625
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTHONY NOBLES
Defendant - Appellee: RODERICK BOYD, KEITH LARSEN and SOUTHERN INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING FOUNDATION, a North Carolina Corporation
Larsen v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04864
Plaintiff: Janice E. Larsen
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?