Cases 21 - 30 of 180
Doe v. Vanderpool et al
as 8:2022cv01915
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Martique Cabral Vanderpool, Philip James Dupree, Stephen Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
McNeil v. Watts et al
as 1:2022cv01411
Plaintiff:
Antwoin McNeil
Defendant:
Gail Watts, Renard Brooks, A. Dupree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammock v. Watts et al
as 1:2022cv01386
Plaintiff:
Terrence Hammock
Defendant:
Gail Watts, Renard Brooks, Major Robert Alford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Saffell v. Watts, et al
as 1:2022cv01363
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Saffell
Defendant:
Gail Watts, Doctor Zowie Barnes and Sgt. Dupree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Clayborn v. Watts et al.
as 1:2022cv01251
Plaintiff:
James Clayborn
Defendant:
Gail Watts, Sgt. Dupree, Officer Beheel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Bowers et al
as 1:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Wayne A Thomas
Defendant:
Ernest Bowers, Lt Perry and Capt Dupree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Grant v. Bowers et al
as 1:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Abdul Grant
Defendant:
Ernest Bowes, Leon Dupree, Tanya Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Hammock v. Watts et al
as 1:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
Terrence Edward Hammock
Defendant:
Director Gail Watts, Officer J. Sherman, Sgt. Bond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Jackson v. Watts
as 1:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Ralph Jackson
Defendant:
Gail Watts, Sgt. Dupree, Sgt. Bond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Clary v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Rayshean Clary
Defendant:
William C. Smith, Ernest Bower, Leon Dupree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
