Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Hoffler v. Kendall
as 8:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hoffler
Defendant:
Frank Kendall, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
Cordova v. Austin et al
as 8:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A CORDOVA and Robert A. Cordova
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, FRANK KENDALL, III, Air Force Board For Correction of Military Records and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Palen v. Kendall
as 1:2022cv01352
Plaintiff:
Joseph C Palen
Defendant:
Frank Kendall
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Harrison v. Kendall, III
as 1:2022cv01298
Plaintiff:
John R. Harrison
Defendant:
Frank Kendall, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Martin Akerman v. Daniel Hokanson
as 22-2154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN AKERMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL DANIEL R. HOKANSON, General, Chief, National Guard Bureau, CHRISTINE WORMUTH, Secretary of the Department of the Army, FRANK KENDALL, Secretary of the Department of the Air Force and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Akerman v. Hokanson et al
as 1:2022cv01258
Plaintiff:
Martin Akerman
Defendant:
General Daniel R. Hokanson, Christine E. Wormuth, Frank Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alvarado et al v. Austin, III et al
as 1:2022cv00876
Plaintiff:
Israel alvarado, steven barfield, Walter Brobst and others
Defendant:
Lloyd Austin, III, Frank Kendall, Carlos Del Toro and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
