Cases 21 - 30 of 34
James Taylor v. David Robinson
as 12-7671
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES IRVIN TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID A. ROBINSON, Chief of Operations, JIM PARKS, Central Classification, ANITA BRYANT, Regional Ombudsman and others
Taylor v. Robinson et al
as 1:2012cv00802
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Taylor
Defendant:
David A. Robinson, Jim Parks, Anita Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Amvest West Virginia Coal, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2012cv01257
Plaintiff:
James F. Taylor
Defendant:
Amvest West Virginia Coal, L.L.C. and Consol Energy Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Taylor v. Dana Transport, Inc.
as 5:2012cv00247
Plaintiff:
James W. Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
Dana Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Amvest West Virginia Coal, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00162
Plaintiff:
James F. Taylor
Defendant:
Amvest West Virginia Coal, LLC and Consol Energy Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
US v. James Taylor
as 10-5279
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES JULIUS TAYLOR
Taylor v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2010cv00619
Plaintiff:
James E. Taylor
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Virginia Department of Taxation, Supreme Court of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
United States of America v. Taylor
as 2:2010cv00946
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James L. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777
Court:
Fourth Circuit
›
West Virginia
›
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Type:
Other Statutes
US v. James Taylor
as 09-7963
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES DARREN TAYLOR
Taylor v. Aqua-Chem Inc et al
as 0:2008cv03102
Plaintiff:
James Carson Taylor
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem Inc, Borg Warner Morse TEC Inc, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
