Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Kurtz et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2016cv03888
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kurtz, Barbara Kurtz, Susan Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LaFon v. Baltimore County et al
as 1:2015cv03216
Plaintiff:
Douglas Blain LaFon
Defendant:
Baltimore County, Baltimore County Police Department, James Kurtz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sullivan v. Calvert Memorial Hospital et al
as 2:2015cv11999
Plaintiff:
Leeanne Marie Sullivan
Defendant:
Calvert Memorial Hospital , Jeffrey Welgoss , Barbara Kurtz Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kurtz v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04591
Plaintiff:
Dolores H. Kurtz
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kraft et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2015cv01517
Plaintiff:
Rose Kraft , Sandra Huss , Kim Hampton and others
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yagan v. Kurtz
as 1:2014cv03032
Plaintiff:
Vivian C. Yagan
Defendant:
Earl M. Kurtz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kurtz v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv10965
Plaintiff:
Brigitte M. Kurtz
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kurtz v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv06781
Plaintiff:
Virginia Kurtz
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nancy Legum v. RBC Capital Markets, LLC.
as 13-1679
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NANCY E. LEGUM and ANTHONY E. KURTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC. and SAMUEL KLUFT KOLTUN
Legum et al v. RBC Capital Markets, LLC, et al
as 8:2012cv03773
Plaintiff:
Nancy E. Legum and Anthony E. Kurtz
Defendant:
RBC Capital Markets, LLC and Samuel Kluft Koltun
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
