Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Waite v. Swaney et al
as 5:2018cv00109
Defendant:
G. Swaney, T. Koch, Nurse James Nolte and others
Plaintiff:
Kirk Waite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Galloway et al v. Big Picture Loans, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00406
Plaintiff:
Renee Galloway, Dianne Turner, Rose Marie Buchert and others
Defendant:
Ascension Technologies, Inc., Matt Martorello and Big Picture Loans, LLC
Interested Party:
Rosette, LLP
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Waite v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
Kirk Waite
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, G. Swaney, T. Koch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nolte v. Bank of America N.A.
as 3:2018mc00088
Petitioner:
Hans Nolte
Respondent:
Bank of America N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Marino et al v. Caraway et al
as 2:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
Vincent Michael Marino and Fred Burlingame
Defendant:
J. F. Caraway, S. Kallis, Koch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marino et al v. Caraway et al
as 3:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Vincent Michael Marino and Fred Burlingame
Defendant:
J. F. Caraway, S. Kallis, Mr. Koch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abdul-Aziz Muhammad v. Dane Heady
as 17-6081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
DANE HEADY, Retired Unit Manager, MICHAEL WEAVER, Health Service Administrator, EDDIE ANDERSON, DO and others
Nolte v. Colvin
as 1:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
Barbara S. Nolte
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Hazelton HSA - Director - FCI et al
as 1:2016cv00226
Plaintiff:
James Tyrone Smith
Defendant:
Hazelton HSA - Director - FCI, James Nolte, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nolting v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00751
Plaintiff:
Karen Nolting
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
