Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Pease v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2014cv17164
Plaintiff:
Lynn Pease
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Levi Springer v. Randall Mathena
as 14-6382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEVI SPRINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL MATHENA, Administration, GEORGE HINKLE, Regional Administration, TERESA PEASE, Institutional Mailroom and others
Pease v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv28237
Plaintiff:
Leslie Abbott Pease
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Levi Springer v. Randall Mathena
as 13-7198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEVI SPRINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL MATHENA, TERESA PEASE, J. EDNEY and others
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT MCCOWAN and TRACY RAY
Cable v. McDonnell et al
as 2:2013cv00125
Plaintiff:
Brian Cable
Defendant:
Robert McDonnell, Ken Cuccenelli, Harold C. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levi Springer v. Randall Mathena
as 13-6214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEVI SPRINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL MATHENA, TERESA PEASE, J. EDNEY and others
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT MCCOWAN and TRACY RAY
La Barbra Jones v. U.S. Probation Office
as 13-6185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LA BARBRA JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, JAMIE PEASE, Probation Officer, LATOYA MOBLEY, Probation Officer and others
Ferebee v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2012cv00612
Defendant:
Patricia Adams, James R. Camache, Harold W. Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Gerald Ferebee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLean v. Pease et al
as 7:2012cv00432
Plaintiff:
Quentin McLean
Defendant:
Ms. Mullins and Ms. Pease
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pease et al v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01844
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Pease and Ronald Pease
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
