Cases 21 - 30 of 482
WARREN v. BRASWELL et al
as 1:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Warren, Jr.
Defendant:
Tyler Braswell, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, New Hanover County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hines v. USA
as 3:2023cv00669
Petitioner:
Warren Eugene Hines, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
COWAN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00857
Plaintiff:
THEODORE WARREN COWAN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Pacheco v. Warren
as 5:2023cv00153
Petitioner:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Respondent:
Heather Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. Henderson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Mackenzie Elaine Brown
Defendant:
Henderson County Sheriff's Office, Robert Jordan Warren, Michael Scott Lindsay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carolina Landmark Realty, LLC v. Lineberger
as 5:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Carolina Landmark Realty, LLC
Defendant:
Vincent Lineberger
3Rd Party Defendant:
Warren Sloan Goforth
JONES v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
RODNEY JONES and RODNEY E. JONES
Defendant:
EDDIE BUFFALOE, SECRETARY EDDIE BUFFALOE, SEC TODD ISHEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
WARREN v. CASSADY
as 1:2023cv00670
Petitioner:
SEAN DEREK WARREN
Respondent:
DAVID CASSADY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WARREN v. WARDEN, DP.S. et al
as 1:2023cv00603
Petitioner:
SEAN DEREK WARREN
Respondent:
WARDEN, DP.S. and D.A.C., STATE OF N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
