Cases 31 - 40 of 226
Defenders of Wildlife et al v. Boyles et al
as 2:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Defenders of Wildlife and South Carolina Coastal Conservation League
Defendant:
Robert H Boyles, Jr, Blaik Keppler, Melvin Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Meyers v. Chief Judge et al
as 5:2022ct03011
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Chief Judge, James N. Ishida, Judge Terrence Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyle v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv03899
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Tyco Fire Products LP and others
Plaintiff:
Ann Boyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fuller v. Honeycutt et al
as 1:2021cv00348
Plaintiff:
Johnathan A. Fuller
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, James Waldroop, Landon Browning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyle v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv03364
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Stephen Boyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyle v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv03246
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James Wilkin Boyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Judson Witham v. US
as 21-2071
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUDSON WITHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TERRENCE W. BOYLE, INTERNATIONAL PAPER AND POWER INC. and others
Jones v. First Colony Pizza, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00510
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jones
Defendant:
First Colony Pizza, Inc. doing business as Dominos Pizza and Scott Boyle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
US v. Kevin Boyle
as 21-4318
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN JOSEPH BOYLE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
David Smith v. US
as 21-6360
Defendant / Appellee:
TERRENCE W. BOYLE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, VINCE M. ROZIER, JR. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LEE SMITH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
