Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Ramirez et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv16581
Plaintiff:
Jewell Ramirez and Agustin Ramirez
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monge v. Lexington County Jail Medical et al
as 4:2014cv01250
Plaintiff:
Alcides Agustin Monge
Defendant:
Lexington County Jail Medical and William Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monge v. Myrtle Beach PD et al
as 4:2014cv00813
Plaintiff:
Alcides Agustin Monge
Defendant:
Myrtle Beach PD, Horry County Jail and J Reuben Long Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Agustin Jeronimo-Roda
as 14-4157
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
AGUSTIN JERONIMO-RODAS
Garcia et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv07328
Plaintiff:
Tayra Garcia and Agustin Garcia
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alvarez et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv14982
Plaintiff:
Maria Alvarez and Agustin Ramirez
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Doe v. Alter et al
as 1:2013cv01548
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Matthew Alter, Nathan Arger, Frederick Mervin Bardell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Camacho et al v. Graff et al
as 2:2013cv00997
Plaintiff:
Agustin Esparza Camacho and Maria Susana Leon
Defendant:
Cody Graff , Ray Barwick , Monks Corner Police Department, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Perez v. Law Offices of Ed Overcash LLC
as 6:2012cv02404
Plaintiff:
Agustin Perez
Defendant:
Law Offices of Ed Overcash LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Agustin Pantoja-Medrano v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-2167
Petitioner:
AGUSTIN PANTOJA-MEDRANO, a/k/a Agustin Pantoja, a/k/a Agustin Pantoja Medrano, a/k/a Augustin Pantoja Medrano
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
