Cases 31 - 40 of 55
HESTER v. BISER
as 1:2016cv00911
Plaintiff:
VALERIE HESTER
Defendant:
JONATHAN BLAIR BISER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BLAIR v. USA
as 1:2016cv00570
Petitioner:
ERIC JUDY PAUL BLAIR
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winstead v. Vaughan
as 5:2014hc02235
Petitioner:
Ronald Blair Winstead
Respondent:
James Vaughan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shope v. Hawksnest Zipline, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00135
Plaintiff:
Blair Shope
Defendant:
Hawksnest Zipline, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitney Blair Custom Homes v. EMC Insurance Group, Inc. et al
as 7:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
Whitney Blair Custom Homes
Defendant:
EMC Insurance Group, Inc. and Employers Mutual Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
Employers Mutual Insurance Company and EMC Insurance Group, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Whitney Blair Custom Homes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Alexander v. Barrero et al
as 5:2012cv00190
Plaintiff:
Lewis Eugene Alexander, Jr.
Defendant:
Julia Barrero, Tom Watson, Aaron Barlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BLAIR v. CALUMAG et al
as 1:2012cv01191
Plaintiff:
EDITH C. BLAIR
Defendant:
WAYNE CALUMAG, P.T. , JACKSON THERAPY PARTNERS, LLC , CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Krausz Industries Ltd. v. Smith-Blair, Inc., et al
as 4:2012cv00187
Plaintiff:
Krausz Industries Ltd.
Defendant:
Smith-Blair, Inc., Sensus USA, Inc. and Sensus Manufacturing Shanghai Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
