Cases 31 - 40 of 140
Reid v. Eaton Corporation Long Term Disability Plan
as 8:2016cv03644
Plaintiff:
Katina Reid
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Love v. Eaton Corporation Disabiltiy Plan for U.S. Employees
as 5:2016cv00860
Plaintiff:
Diane Love
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation Disabiltiy Plan for U.S. Employees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Gist v. Eaton Corporation Long Term Disability Plan
as 7:2016cv03127
Plaintiff:
Shirlene D Gist
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Carroll v. Eaton Corporation Long Term Disability Plan
as 8:2016cv02608
Plaintiff:
Theodore R Carroll
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Boyce v. Eaton Corporation Long Term Disability Plan
as 1:2016cv00242
Plaintiff:
Barbara Boyce
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Moore, Jr. et al v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00157
Defendant:
Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc, 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and others
Plaintiff:
Moore, Jr, Howard Milton Moore, Jr. and Lena Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv04236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Crummer v. Crane Co. et al
as 4:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
Leroy C. Crummer and Suzanne K. Crummer
Defendant:
Crane Co. , Eaton Corporation , Electric Boat Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. EATON CORPORATION, et al
as 1:2015cv00553
Plaintiff:
RICKY TYRONE SMITH
Defendant:
EATON CORPORATION, EATON AEROQUIP, LLC, AUTOCAR, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Eaton Corporation v. Cornell Dubilier Electronics, Inc.
as 5:2015cv00238
Plaintiff:
Eaton Corporation
Defendant:
Cornell Dubilier Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
