Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Brown v. Dillman
as 1:2013cv00924
Petitioner: Bryant Lee Brown
Respondent: Jeffrey N. Dillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henley v. Dillman
as 1:2013cv00877
Petitioner: Holman B. Henley, Jr.
Respondent: Jeffrey N. Dillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. International Wire Products Company
as 7:1986dv02822
Plaintiff: Jeffrey N Holmes
Defendant: International Wire Products Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Traon Robinson v. Jeffrey Dillman
as 12-7904
Plaintiff - Appellant: TRAON ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee: JEFFREY N. DILLMAN, Warden, ERIC ALDRIDGE, Asst. Warden and MCCOY, Major
Robinson v. Dillman et al
as 1:2012cv00991
Plaintiff: Traon Robinson
Defendant: Jeffrey N. Dillman, Eric Aldridge and McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00146
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Quarles v. Dillman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2011cv00217
Defendant: Warden Jeffrey N. Dillman, John S. Garman, Cynthia A. Matthews and others
Plaintiff: Larry Quarles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quarles v. Dillman et al
as 3:2011cv00278
Plaintiff: Larry Quarles
Defendant: Jeffrey N. Dillman, Kevin L. Pickerel and Cynthia A. Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Pocahontas State Correctional Center We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2011cv00145
Plaintiff: Jeffrey N. Coleman
Defendant: Pocahontas State Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Katz We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2011cv00092
Plaintiff: Jeffrey N. Coleman
Defendant: Alan Katz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?