Cases 31 - 40 of 73
King et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv29657
Plaintiff:
Michele L. King and Jeffrey King
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv27087
Plaintiff:
Joyce L. King
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher Julian v. USDA
as 14-1925
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER B. JULIAN and RENEE G. JULIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, JAMES RIGNEY, USDA Farm Service Agency Farm Loan Officer, RONALD A. KRASZEWSKI, USDA Farm Service Agency Farm Loan Manager and others
Curtis King v. Officer Yancey Young
as 14-7226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS L. KING
Defendant - Appellee:
MALE OFFICER YOUNG
Defendant:
JON OZMINT, WARDEN CARTLEDGE, MAJOR LEWIS and others
King v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2014cv02804
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Plaintiff:
Terry L King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher Julian v. USDA
as 14-1480
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER B. JULIAN and RENEE G. JULIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, JAMES RIGNEY, USDA Farm Service Agency Farm Loan Officer, RONALD A. KRASZEWSKI, USDA Farm Service Agency Farm Loan Manager and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv01677
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
King v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv11419
Plaintiff:
Tina L. King
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv10406
Plaintiff:
Shari L. King
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv04112
Plaintiff:
Teresa L. King and Mark King
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
