Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Neri-Castellanos v. USA
as 4:2010cv70146
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Arturo Neri-Castellanos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bruno v. Nery et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv03086
Plaintiff: Michael Bruno
Defendant: Tony V. Nery, Brian Smith, Day Hoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salinas v. Dillman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00510
Petitioner: Nery Arnoldo Salinas
Respondent: Jeffrey Dillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dees v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2009ct03040
Plaintiff: Shannon Dees
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BARNES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2008ct03171
Plaintiff: Reginald Dewayne Barnes
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
US v. Guadalupe Neri-Templos
as 08-5105
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: GUADALUPE NERI-TEMPLOS, a/k/a Guadalupe Templos
US v. Antonio Augustine-Neri We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-4921
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: ANTONIO AUGUSTINE-NERI
Salinas v. Dillman
as 7:2008cv00268
Plaintiff: Nery A. Salinas
Defendant: Jeffrey Dillman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Medrano et al v. Williams Mechanical Contracting Corporation et al
as 8:2008cv00471
Plaintiff: Efren Medrano, Efren Medrano, Jorge Castillo and others
Defendant: Williams Mechanical Contracting Corporation, Design Build Mechanical Corp. and Scottie Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?