Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Springer v. Mathena et al
as 7:2012cv00074
Defendant:
Larry Collins, J. Edney, Randal Mathena and others
Plaintiff:
Levi Springer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. U.S. Probation Office et al
as 3:2012cv00008
Plaintiff:
LaBarbra Lavell Jones
Defendant:
U.S. Probation Office, Jamie Pease, Latoya Mobley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Schilling et al
as 7:2011cv00255
Defendant:
Tony Adams, James Bentley, Amy Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mututal of Omaha Insurance Company v. Pease
as 3:2010cv00064
Plaintiff:
Mututal of Omaha Insurance Company
Defendant:
William A Pease
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Johnson v. Mueller et al
as 7:2010cv00431
Defendant:
Patricia Adams, Tony Adams, Bellamy and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lonnie Gholson v. Gene Johnson
as 10-7010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE MCDONOVAN GHOLSON, etc., all
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Head Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, JOHN JABE, Deputy Director for VDOC, RANDALL MATHENA, Former Arrest Warden at ROSP and others
Kevin Johnson v. John Jabe
as 10-6847
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN JOHNSON, a/k/a Olando Lee Trent
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN JABE, Deputy Director, Virginia Department of Corrections (VDOC), GENE JOHNSON, Director, VDOC, GARY CLORE, Gang Unit Director, VDOC and others
Brown v. Ray et al
as 7:2009cv00180
Plaintiff:
Kelvin E. Brown
Defendant:
Tracy S. Ray, L. Fleming and T. Pease
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pease v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 0:2008cv03498
Plaintiff:
Jessica R Pease
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
