Cases 31 - 40 of 194
Phillip Alig v. Quicken Loans Inc.
as 19-1059
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROXANNE SHEA, DANIEL V. SHEA, SARA J. ALIG and others
Defendant:
APPRAISALS UNLIMITED, INCORPORATED, RICHARD HYETT and DEWEY V. GUIDA
Defendant / Appellant:
AMROCK INC., f/k/a Title Source, Incorporated, d/b/a Title Source Inc. of West Virginia, Incorporated and QUICKEN LOANS INC.
Lafountain v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 1:2018cv01658
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Lafountain
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TYLER v. BARCELLONA et al
as 1:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
MILO DANIEL TYLER
Defendant:
TOM BARCELLONA, ANDREW P. CLEMENT, WILLIAMS W. BAGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. VANEEKHOVEN
as 1:2017cv01056
Plaintiff:
TAVOEL LAVELLE BROWN, JR
Defendant:
ROXANN VANEEKHOVEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donato v. Orbital ATK, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01271
Defendant:
Janice I. Obuchowski, James G. Roche, Ronald R. Fogleman and others
Plaintiff:
Diane Donato
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Cramer v. Oribital ATK, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01225
Plaintiff:
Kelly Cramer
Defendant:
Janice I. Obuchowski, Ronald R. Fogleman, David W. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Simnowitz v. Orbital ATK, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01181
Defendant:
Janice I. Obuchowski, James G. Roche, Ronald R. Fogleman and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Simnowitz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
JARMON v. VANEEKILOVEN
as 1:2017cv00933
Plaintiff:
OSCAR LEONARD JARMON
Defendant:
ROXANN VANEEKILOVEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berg v. Orbital ATK, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01169
Defendant:
Janice I. Obuchowski, James G. Roche, Roman Martinez, IV and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Berg
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Justin Sedon v. Orbital ATK, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01164
Defendant:
Janice I. Obuchowski, James G. Roche, Ronald R. Fogleman and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Sedon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
