Cases 31 - 40 of 53
White v. Poetter et al
as 5:2019ct03134
Defendant:
Dr. Cross, Warden Royster, Dr. Dunston and others
Plaintiff:
Shelby Jean White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Womack v. Howell et al
as 1:2018cv00352
Plaintiff:
Carl Womack
Defendant:
Shelby Police Department, Karen Wright and Carrie Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green et al v. City of Shelby et al
as 1:2018cv00349
Defendant:
Rick Howell and City of Shelby
Plaintiff:
Willie E. Green, Willie A. Green, Sr. and 5-Star Athlete, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00118
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Ruff v. Walker et al
as 1:2016cv00296
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lamont Ruff
Defendant:
Thomas G. Walker, Shelby Police Department and David A. Wacaster
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris et al v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00321
Plaintiff:
Otha Morris and Shelby Morris
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas, Inc. and Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lovelace et al v. City of Shelby, NC
as 1:2014cv00037
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Lovelace and Stony G. Yearwood
Defendant:
City of Shelby, NC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
KELLAM v. NADARAJAH et al
as 1:2013cv01125
Plaintiff:
SHELBY B. KELLAM
Defendant:
PQNNUTHURAI NADARAJAH and AMTEX TRANSPORT LOGISTIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shelby Personnel Services v. SFI Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00382
Plaintiff:
Shelby Personnel Services
Defendant:
SFI Holdings, Inc., SFI Holdings LLC, Kelly S. Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
