Cases 41 - 50 of 578
Adam Hall v. James Pierce
as 22-7068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM W. HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES PIERCE, Asst. Unit Manager
Hall v. Pierce
as 5:2022ct03324
Plaintiff:
Adam W. Hall
Defendant:
James F. Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGriff El v. Centralize Infraction Bureau et al
as 5:2022ct03311
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Lee McGriff El
Defendant:
Centralize Infraction Bureau, North Carolina Superior Court, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022hc02151
Petitioner:
Thomas Enely Davis
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Sheriff Larry Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1955
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HARDIN v. PEAKE et al
as 1:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH JOI PEAKE, KATY POOLE, OFFICER WILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardin v. Everett et al
as 5:2022ct03255
Plaintiff:
Charlie L. Hardin
Defendant:
D. Everett, Captain Turley, C/O Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGriff El v. Pierce et al
as 5:2022ct03238
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Lee McGriff El
Defendant:
Sheriff Larry Pierce, Major Thaxton, Capt. Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGriff El v. Mozingo et al
as 5:2022ct03217
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Lee McGriff El
Defendant:
Capt. Mozingo, Major Thaxton and Sheriff Larry Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGriff El v. Pierce
as 5:2022hc02127
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Lee McGriff El
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
