Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Harman v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv24997
Plaintiff:
Josephine A. Harman
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harman et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2014cv19603
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Harman and Edward Harman
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yarid v. Harman et al
as 3:2014cv00112
Plaintiff:
George Yarid
Defendant:
Layton Harman, Shon Brennan and Roy Gerbil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Harman v. Healthsouth Corporation Long Term Disability Plan et al
as 3:2013cv32484
Plaintiff:
Donna Harman
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Pursuit Enterprises, LLC et al v. Stanwick et al
as 5:2013cv00680
Plaintiff:
Pursuit Enterprises, LLC and Polly A. Harman
Defendant:
Covington Stanwick , Craig Eney and Stanwick Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harman v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2013cv01728
Plaintiff:
Julian Harman
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Draughn v. Harman et al
as 1:2013cv00148
Plaintiff:
Mary C. Draughn
Defendant:
Shelby L. Harman , National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburg, PA and Chartis Claims, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harman et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv09474
Plaintiff:
Shirley Harman and Howard E. Harman, Sr.
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Trinity Industries, Inc. et al v. Harman
as 1:2013mc00012
Plaintiff:
Trinity Industries, Inc. and The Texas A&M University System
Defendant:
Joshua Harman
George Yarid v. Layton Harman
as 13-1048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE ALEXANDER YARID
Defendant - Appellee:
LAYTON HARMAN, ROBERT ROONEY, JOHN LUCAS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
