Cases 41 - 50 of 131
Aaron Doxie, III v. Jeffrey Dillman
as 16-6983
Petitioner - Appellant:
AARON DOXIE, III, a/k/a Aharon Azaryah Nearyah Hakahan
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN JEFFREY N. DILLMAN, Warden and DIRECTOR HAROLD CLARKE, Director
Doxie v. Dillman et al
as 2:2016cv00402
Petitioner:
Aaron Doxie, III
Respondent:
Jeffrey N. Dillman and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tucker v. Dillman
as 3:2016cv00411
Petitioner:
Rodney Antonio Tucker
Respondent:
Jeffrey Dillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dillman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04472
Plaintiff:
Juanita Dillman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Golden v. Clarke et al
as 2:2016cv00195
Plaintiff:
Gerald L. Golden, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Harold W. Clarke, Dr. Tessema, M.D., Captain N. Mayo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Louis Chapman v. Bullock
as 16-6354
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS ROY CHAPMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BULLOCK, Correctional Officer, Female, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally, D. NEWCOMER, Captain, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally, JOHN BENDRICK, Sergeant, Investigator, Powhatan Correctional Center, sued personally and professionally and others
Golden v. Ingru et al
as 2:2016cv00101
Plaintiff:
Gerald L. Golden, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Ingru, Officer Quigley, Sgt. Jermaine Alley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penn v. Dillman et al
as 2:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
Anthony W. Penn, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Dillman, S. Carney and Mr. L. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ragland v. Lee et al
as 1:2015cv01663
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Ragland
Defendant:
S. Lee, J.N. Dillman and Charlene Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braden et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv16237
Plaintiff:
Sandra Braden and James Dillman
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
