Cases 41 - 50 of 79
Read v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv06557
Plaintiff:
Pamela K. Read
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Read et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv04341
Plaintiff:
Kathy Read and Jimmy Read
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Read et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv31207
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Rogers Read and Albert Ferris Read
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Teasley et al v. First Coast Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00043
Plaintiff:
Merrily A. Teasley and Balsam Mountain Springs Hotel, LLC
Defendant:
First Coast Group, Inc., Harold Read Shailer and Sharon Kaye Shailer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Reading et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv27253
Plaintiff:
Andrea Reading and Robert Reading
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Read v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv22575
Plaintiff:
Patty Read
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Read v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv21208
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Read
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Read v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv18394
Plaintiff:
Sharon Read
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miles v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2013cv01408
Plaintiff:
Kelvin J Miles
Defendant:
Supervisor, J Glen, Edward Read and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Read v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv10436
Plaintiff:
Jody A. Read
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
