Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Zao Odessky Konjatschnyi Zawod v. Sia "Baltmark Invest" et al
as 1:2012cv00515
Plaintiff:
Zao Odessky Konjatschnyi Zawod
Defendant:
Sia "Baltmark Invest, Global Closed Joint Stock Company and Zao "Gruppa Predpriyatij Ost
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071
Carlos Robinson v. USP Hazelton
as 10-2181
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS DEMOND ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
USP HAZELTON, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, N. SHULTZ and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv02675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Woods v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2010cv00420
Defendant:
Lt. J. Baker, Mrs. T. Brown, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
L-3 Services, Inc. et al v. Szekely et al
as 1:2010cv00687
Plaintiff:
L-3 Services, Inc. and Binary Ionization, Inc.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Szekely, Ralph Sias, Paul Stolz and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
L-3 Services, Inc. et al v. Szekely et al
as 2:2010cv00350
Defendant:
Advanced Disinfection Technologies, LLC, Paul Stolz, Ralph Sias and others
Plaintiff:
L-3 Services, Inc. and Binary Ionization, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
L-3 Services, Inc. et al v. Szekely et al
as 2:2010cv00290
Plaintiff:
L-3 Services, Inc. and Binary lonization Inc.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Szekely, Ralph Sias, Paul Stolz and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Gerard Louis v. Warden Al Haynes
as 08-6690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERARD LOUIS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN AL HAYNES, WARDEN JOE DRIVER, ASSO WARDEN D. GILL and others
Lamont Henderson v. P. Liggin
as 08-6613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAMONT HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
P. LIGGIN, Federal Correctional Officer, in his individual and official capacity, JOHN J. LAMANNA, in his individual and official capacity and OFFICER MCLAFFERTY, SIA, in his individual and official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
