Cases 51 - 60 of 112
Taylor v. Lawson et al
as 5:2010ct03033
Plaintiff:
Oscar L. Taylor
Defendant:
ANGELA LAWSON, MELISSA BURGESS, MONIQUE FREENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Holder et al
as 2:2010cv00027
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Nunez Ramos
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Harley Lappin and Kuma J. DeBoo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lewis v. Lappin
as 3:2010cv00130
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wayne Lewis
Defendant:
Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackcloud v. Holder et al
as 2:2010cv00020
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Blackcloud
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Harley Lappin and Kuma DeBoo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ramirez v. Holder et al
as 1:2010cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jose Ramirez
Defendant:
Eric Holder and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Creech v. Drew et al
as 0:2010cv00108
Plaintiff:
Billy Eugene Creech
Defendant:
Darlene Drew, Mitch Huffman and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Chase et al v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 7:2010cv00021
:
, , and others
Defendant:
Harley Lappin and Terry O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Marshall v. Lappin et al
as 2:2010cv00003
Plaintiff:
La'Ron Marshall
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, K. M. White, James Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lee v. Holder et al
as 2:2009cv00144
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Lee
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Betsy C. Jividen and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Benavides v. Lappin et al
as 2:2009cv02996
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Benavides
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, R Holt, Mary Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
