Cases 51 - 60 of 912
Lentz v. Campbell et al
as 5:2023ct03078
Plaintiff:
Shelby Reid Lentz
Defendant:
Travon Campbell, Aisha Cherry, Hunter Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Smith et al
as 5:2023ct03077
Plaintiff:
Clevis M. Morrison
Defendant:
Domanick D. Smith, Raven Barnes, Officer Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DORIETY v SLETTEN et al
as 1:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
WAKITA DORIETY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, CITY OF GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA and MATTHEW LEWIS SLETTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Johnson v. Strickland et al
as 5:2023ct03046
Plaintiff:
Carl Deion Johnson and Carl Deion Johnson-El
Defendant:
Mr. Strickland, Mark Barnhill, Jana Helms-Nealeys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberson v. Lewis et al
as 5:2023ct03043
Plaintiff:
Samuel Gordon Roberson
Defendant:
Doctor Lewis, Nurse Sykes, Nurse Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUCKER v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 1:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEWIS TUCKER
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lewis v. Maynor
as 1:2023cv00034
Petitioner:
Brian Kevin Lewis
Respondent:
Timothy Maynor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Floyd v. USA
as 1:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
Hasson Lewis Floyd
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lewis v. Miller Valentine Group et al
as 3:2022cv00696
Plaintiff:
Leegraciea Lewis
Defendant:
Southwest Realty Company, Miller Valentine Group, Landings at Steele Creek Apartments and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
