Cases 51 - 60 of 268
Ali v. Streeval
as 7:2022cv00200
Petitioner:
Hassan Ali
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval, C. Cervantes, Gene Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wright v. FBOP Mental Health Services USP Hazelton et al
as 3:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Marcus Wright
Defendant:
FBOP Mental Health Services USP Hazelton, FBI of San Antonio Texas and U.S. Prosecutors of San Antonio Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mark Manasse v. Warden
as 22-6326
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK MANASSE
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, USP LEE
Sanders v. Warden, USP Hazelton
as 5:2022cv00040
Petitioner:
Polly Anne Sanders
Respondent:
Warden, USP Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gary Hancock v. Nancy Smith
as 22-6352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY WARREN HANCOCK, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY SMITH, Health care provider, RN BENJAMIN PARKER, DEBBIE SAYLOR and others
NORMAN v. USP CANAAN
as 1:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN M. NORMAN
Defendant:
USP CANAAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Lightbourn v. Warden, USP Hazelton
as 5:2022cv00078
Petitioner:
Donaveon Lightbourn
Respondent:
Warden, USP Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harper v. Warden, USP Hazelton
as 5:2022cv00041
Petitioner:
Kelly Harper
Respondent:
Warden, USP Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rozier v. Case Manager Coordinator USP Lee et al
as 7:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rozier
Defendant:
Case Manager Coordinator USP Lee and Captain USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Martin v. Warden of FCI Hazelton and unknowns et al
as 3:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
James A. Martin
Defendant:
Warden of FCI Hazelton and unknowns and Warden of USP Hazelton and unknowns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
