Cases 61 - 70 of 110
Lane v. Trent
as 2:2013cv00006
Petitioner:
David Allen Lane
Respondent:
George E. Trent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bolling v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00035
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
David Allen Bolling
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
US v. David Twyman
as 12-6552
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID ALLEN TWYMAN, a/k/a Al Green
City of Charleston v. Boggess et al
as 2:2012cv00225
Plaintiff:
City of Charleston
Defendant:
Myron G. Boggess, William L. Gill, Eric N. Abilmona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Reinhardt v. O'Malley et al
as 8:2012cv00187
Plaintiff:
David Allen Reinhardt
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Gary D. Maynard and Michael J. Stouffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Allen Company v. KIM et al
as 8:2011cv03574
Defendant:
Jang Ho Kim and Artelye, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Allen Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Atlas Logistics Group Retail Services, LLC
as 7:2011cv00552
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Anderson, James Eugene Blankenship, Jeffrey Bolling Breedlove and others
Defendant:
Atlas Logistics Group Retail Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Bowen v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00021
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
David Allen Bowen
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv02648
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Clark v. Stevens et al
as 1:2010cv02173
Plaintiff:
Yolonda Clark
Defendant:
Roy Anthony Stevens and David Allen Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
