Cases 61 - 70 of 231
Romney v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 5:2010hc02214
Petitioner:
Makonnen Romney
Respondent:
Attorney General of the United States, Harrell Watts, Harley G. Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gale v. Lappin et al
as 5:2010hc02215
Petitioner:
Melvin Gale
Respondent:
Harley Lappin and Jonathan C. Miner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Scinto v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2010ct03165
Plaintiff:
PAUL SCINTO, SR.
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons , Harley G. Lappin , KIM M. WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Judd v. Holder et al
as 1:2010cv00145
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Harley G. Lappin, U S Department Of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Burt v. Johns et al
as 5:2010ct03156
Plaintiff:
Yolonda Deyvonne Burt
Defendant:
Tracy W. Johns, C. Brummell, J. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shipley v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 5:2010ct03153
Plaintiff:
Lloyd D. Shipley
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons , US Department of Justice , Harley G. Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Judd v. Lappin et al
as 1:2010cv00963
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Attorney General of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Leslie Achter v. Harley Lappin
as 10-7171
Petitioner - Appellant:
LESLIE ALLEN ACHTER
Respondent - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director and JAMES N. CROSS, Warden
Judd v. Lappin et al
as 5:2010cv00083
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin and Attorney General of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Will Anderson v. D. Stephen
as 10-7113
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILL ANDERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
D. R. STEPHENS
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director for the Federal Bureau of Prisons and JOHN JOE, (DC) Trustee for the Federal Bureau of Prisons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
