Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 61 - 70 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00353
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WEAKS v. COUNTY OF CABARRUS et al
as 1:2014cv00050
Plaintiff: JAMIL RASHEEM WEAKS
Defendant: COUNTY OF CABARRUS, ROXANN L. VANEEKHOVEN and MEGAN BAUMGARDNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Community Carepartners, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00006
Plaintiff: Megan Parker
Defendant: Community Carepartners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Powell et al v. Kamireddy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2013cv00267
Defendant: Ramesh B. Kamireddy and VeriSign, Inc.
Plaintiff: Megan R. Powell and Timothy B. Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILL v. VANEEKHOVEN et al
as 1:2013cv01095
Plaintiff: MARCUS DWAYNE HILL
Defendant: ROXANN L. VANEEKHOVEN, MEGAN E. BAUMGARDNER and CABARRUS COUNTY, MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. VANEEKHOVEN et al
as 1:2013cv00963
Plaintiff: MARCUS DWAYNE HILL
Defendant: ROXANN L. VANEEKHOVEN and MEGAN E. BAUMGARDNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN THE MATTER OF MEGAN MOBLEY-BOGGS
as 1:2013mc00013
Respondent: IN THE MATTER OF MEGAN MOBLEY-BOGGS
FISHER-BORNE et al v. SMITH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00589
Plaintiff: MARCIE FISHER-BORNE , CHANTELLE FISHER-BORNE , TERRI BECK and others
Defendant: JOHN W. SMITH , DAVID L. CHURCHILL and ARCHIE L. SMITH III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2012cv00127
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dolan v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00210
Plaintiff: Megan E. Dolan
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?