Cases 61 - 70 of 2,448
Clinchfield Coal Company v. DOWCP
as 23-2145
Petitioner:
CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY, c/o HealthSmart Casualty Claims Solutions
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and RAYMOND J. CARTY
US v. Raymond Aigbekaen
as 23-7067
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RAYMOND IDEMUDIA AIGBEKAEN
US v. Garlin Farris
as 23-7065
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GARLIN RAYMOND FARRIS, a/k/a G
Marilyn Seay Propst v. State of West Virginia
as 23-2112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARILYN E. SEAY PROPST
Plaintiff:
DAWN PROPST, CHARLES PROPST, DAWN LOCKARD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, JERRY MOORE, JEFF BOWERS and others
Allen Littlejohn v. Jamie Bullard
as 23-7045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLEN LITTLEJOHN, a/k/a Allen Littlejohn, III
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMIE BULLARD, RAYMOND BAILEY, ROSEMARY BIANCARDI and others
Mary Frances Raymond v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv05217
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Frances Raymond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
US v. Garlin Farris
as 23-7022
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GARLIN RAYMOND FARRIS, a/k/a G
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02799
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
